Darkoneko

=> fr:user talk:Darkoneko

Unacceptable

This is unacceptable !!! You can't delete blank the template !!! -- Si Gam Acèh (peugah habay | peuneugöt) 16:01, 18 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

It's true that removing the template is groundless, but why you don't accept my suggestion for compromise (modifying the template to link the voting page)? --Juhko (talk | contribs) 16:39, 18 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

This UNFAIR , all the steward attacked acewiki and banned admin access unilaterally without considering the opinions of others. Does stewards do can like that?

I'll support you as long as possible, but if we want to continue this Wikipedia we have to have mutual understanding. The template may be modified less belligerent, but keep the matter. If we want to undo stewards' administrator clearance we must make consensus. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 17:02, 18 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

What we want is the images deleted from Wikipedia. -- Si Gam Acèh (peugah habay | peuneugöt) 04:35, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

What I want is a world without war. Do I go and put a banner about this on the main page of my wiki ? Darkoneko 08:31, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

You start the war. -- Si Gam Acèh (peugah habay | peuneugöt) 08:58, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Not really. Darkoneko 09:23, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Much easier way to have the images deleted from Wikipedia is to bring the case forward on English Wikipedia or Meta-Wiki (I mean the images, not that template). It helps much more than boycotting or wrangling. The template isn't the main case here, it's the images, am I right? --Juhko (talk | contribs) 09:30, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Also see, Wikimedia projects are very much independent, and this case is a good example of stewards abusing their rights. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 09:33, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

The first part is true ; us stewards leave local projects alone unless there's unchecked vandalism or a serious problem. But unfortunatly, we think that this banner IS a serious problem. Darkoneko 09:45, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

I have justified many times why the template isn't against any policy, and it's the local community to decide does it exist on main page or not. And I support Si Gam Acèh and Fadli Idris. I have tried to solve this with many suggestions; making the template less belligerent, modifying it to link the voting page about the images, not using any template but bringing Acehnese wikipedians' opinion forward on Meta and English Wikipedia, where they are topical. as the last chance I tried to make a voting. Now I can't say anything else, than please unblock Si Gam Acèh. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 09:58, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

I'd gladly unblock him, if only he stopped trying adding it again and again on the main page using the various included templates... it just moved the edit war on these templates. Darkoneko 10:10, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Could you try to unblock him now and everyone on ace.wikipedia move this discussion only on this comment request. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 10:15, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

You seems to be the voice of reason of this wiki. Si Gam Acèh is now unblocked ; I hope he won't try anything rash again. Darkoneko 10:23, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

I post him a message to stop the demonstration and discuss constructively on the comment request I opened here. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 10:33, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Request

Can I have my administrator rights back now? I would _try_ to calm down other users. I don't give my word I'll succeed.. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 11:16, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

This is done. I wish you good luck. Darkoneko 11:57, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 11:59, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)